Trans People Are Facing Authoritarianism and Eliminationism
Is Critical Scholarship Failing to Respond?
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.eamou6-2682Mots-clés :
transgender, Supreme Court, EHRC, Sullivan Review, trans geographiesRésumé
We stand at a perilous juncture wherein trans and gender diverse people in the UK and beyond are increasingly subject to authoritarian and eliminationist political forces. Following the UK Supreme Court judgement of April 2025 and amid the continual emergence of political and policy apparatuses that increasingly call for heightened control, surveillance, and restriction of the scope of trans people’s lives, including the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission’s Code of Practice, and the ‘Cass’ and ‘Sullivan’ Reviews, in this piece I ask: are critical scholars failing to act with urgency to protect trans people when most needed? I argue that critical scholars should resist the installation of logics that enforce rigid, hygienically-policed sex/gender binaries, question individuals’ selfhoods and autonomy, and undermine ethical standards, recognising in turn the consequences these hold for all marginalised groups and for conducting critical social science research. Moments of solidarity demonstrate the influence that critical scholars can wield to address the emergency nature of this moment, and to ensure that trans people and trans research can be valued and maintained within the academy. Failing to do so risks the loss of trans scholars and trans scholarship, one that critical scholars would carry as their failure and burden.
Références
Bender-Baird, Kyla. 2016. “Peeing under surveillance: bathrooms, gender policing, and hate violence,” Gender, Place and Culture, 23(7): 983-988.
Brice, Sage. 2023. “Making space for a radical trans imagination: Towards a kinder, more vulnerable, geography,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(4): 592-599.
Browne, Kath. 2004. “Genderism and the Bathroom Problem: (re)materialising sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies,” Gender, Place and Culture, 11(3): 331–346.
Cass, Hillary. 2024. “Independent review of gender identity services for children and young people: Final report,” https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/
Council of Europe. 2025. “United Kingdom: tackling poverty is crucial to protect children’s human rights; a number of other areas also call for attention,” Council of Europe, 8 July 2025, https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/united-kingdom-tackling-poverty-is-crucial-to-protect-children-s-human-rights-a-number-of-other-areas-also-call-for-attention
Doan, Petra L. 2010. The tyranny of gendered spaces – reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place and Culture, 17(5): 635–654.
Gieseking, Jack. 2023. Reflections on a cis discipline. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(4): 571-591.
Kinkaid, Eden. 2024. “Will we avert geography’s ‘trans failure’?,” American Association of Geographers, 26 February 2024, https://www.aag.org/will-we-avert-geographys-trans-failure/
Lemkin Institute. 2025a. “Red Flag Alert on Anti-trans and intersex Rights in the UK,” Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, 30 July 2025, https://www.lemkininstitute.com/_files/ugd/bb6a09_549b26db7fe641d082d917ab083af871.pdf
Lemkin Institute. 2025b. “Statement on the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission: Violation of the Paris Principles and erosion of protections for transgender and intersex people,” Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, 5 September 2025, https://www.lemkininstitute.com/statements-new-page/statement-on-the-uk%E2%80%99s-equality-and-human-rights-commission%3A-violation-of-the-paris-principles-and-erosion-of-protections-for-transgender-and-intersex-people
Marshall, Lo. 2021. Navigating gender diverse worlds assembled upon binary expectations: Investigating the experiences of trans people living in Britain. Doctoral thesis, University College London
McNamara, Meridithe et al. 2024. “An evidence-based critique of ‘The Cass Review’ on gender-affirming care for adolescent gender dysphoria,” https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf
Namaste, K. 1996. “Genderbashing: Sexuality, Gender, and the Regulation of Public Space,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(2): 221-240.
Newnham College, University of Cambridge. 2025. “Research Fellowships,” Archived 8 October 2025, http://archive.today/4lQPv
Noone, Chris et al. 2025. “Critically appraising the Cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25(1): 1-18.
Rabesandratana, Tania. 2023. “U.K. government vow to end ‘woke’ science draws rebuke from researchers,” Science, 17 October 2023, https://www.science.org/content/article/uk-government-vow-end-woke-science-draws-rebuke-researchers
RGS–IBG (2025). “Letter to Jay Todd and signatories,” Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers, 8 May 2025, https://www.rgs.org/media/rumia1mb/rgs-response-to-open-letter-re-sc-ehrc.pdf
RGS-IBG (2025b). “Response: EHRC code of practice for services, public functions and associations,” Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers, https://www.rgs.org/about-us/what-is-geography/consultations/ehrc-code-of-practice-for-services-public-functions-and-associations
Rosenberg, Rae. (2023). “On surviving a cis discipline,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(4): 600–605.
Smith, Matt C., Gilchrist, Paul and Lim, Jason. 2023. “Planning in the ‘LGBTQ Capital’: Choreographing Transgender In and Out of Policy,” Urban Planning, 8(2): 197–207.
Somerville, Shirley-Anne. 2025. “Supreme Court Judgement - For Women Scotland vs Scottish Ministers: Social Justice Secretary Statement,” Scottish Government, 22 April 2025, https://www.gov.scot/publications/supreme-court-judgement-for-women-scotland-vs-scottish-ministers-social-justice-secretary-statement-22-april-2025/
Sullivan, Alice. 2025a. “Review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender: Report 1,” Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, 19 March 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67d98b8a4ba412c67701ed92/review-of-data-statistics-research-on-sex-and-gender.pdf.
Sullivan, Alice. 2025b. “Review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender: Report2: Barriers to research on sex and gender,” Sullivan Review website, https://www.sullivanreview.uk/barriers.pdf
Supreme Court. 2025. Judgment: For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent), Given on 16 April 2025, The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2024_0042_judgment_aea6c48cee.pdf
Todd, Jay J.D. 2021. “Exploring trans people's lives in Britain, trans studies, geography and beyond: A review of research progress,” Geography Compass, 15(4): e12556.
Todd, Jay J.D. 2024. “Exploring young trans people's everyday experiences of ‘out‐of‐placeness’ and socio‐bodily dysphoria,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(2), e12662.
Todd, Jay J.D. 2025. “Intervention—533 Geographers Call for Action on Transphobic Developments in the UK, its Supreme Court, and the EHRC,” Antipode Foundation, 6 May 2025, https://antipodeonline.org/2025/05/06/533-geographers-call-for-action/
Todd, Jay J.D. and Callard, Felicity. 2026. “A critical response to the UK’s ‘Sullivan Review’ into sex and gender in research and data,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.
TransActual. 2025. “Trans segregation in practice: Experiences of trans segregation following the Supreme Court ruling,” TransActual, August 2025, https://transactual.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Trans-Segregation-in-Practice.pdf
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Jay Todd 2026
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Les auteur-e-s publiant dans ACME le font aux conditions de la licence canadienne Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works". En conséquence, les auteur-e-s gardent les droits sur leur texte, ainsi que celui d'être identifié-e-s comme auteur-e-s sans limitation de date. Leur texte peut être partagé librement (soit reproduit, distribué, transmis et publié) dans les conditions suivantes :
- Attribution. La publication originale de ladite oeuvre dans ACME doit être mentionnée et, pour tout usage ou distribution, les termes de sa licence doivent être précisés.
- Non commercial. L'oeuvre ne peut être utilisée à des fins commerciales.
- Pas de travaux dérivés. À l'exception d'usages légitimes dans des buts universitaires ou critiques, l'oeuvre ne peut être altérée ou transformée. À l'exception de la première condition d'attribution à ACME de la publication originale, toutes ces conditions peuvent être levées avec la permission explicite du détenteur du copyright.
(Note: du volume 1(1) au volume 7(2), les auteur-e-s ont donné à ACME un copyright sur leur article limité à la publication dans la revue. Les auteur-e-s gardent le copyright sur leur manuscrit pour toute autre forme de publication, mais doivent mentionner la publication originale dans ACME si le texte est republié ailleurs).
Pour une publication dans ACME, les auteur-e-s déclarent que et se portent garant-e-s que
- leur article est une oeuvre originale, n'a pas été publié avant et n'est pas soumis ailleurs pour publication papier ou électronique sous sa forme finale ;
- Illes ont obtenu l'autorisation de reproduction (papier et électronique) de la part du possesseur des droits de copyright pour tout le matériau qui ne leur appartient pas, et que le possesseur est cité comme source ;
- Leur article ne contient aucun élément violant un copyright existant, le droit d'un tiers, ou quoi que ce soit de nature obscène, indécente, calomniatrice ou en quelque façon illégale ; et, qu'en l'état de leurs connaissance, leur article n'empiète sur les droit de personne.
- Ils ont la charge d'indemniser les rédacteurs et éditeurs d'ACME pour toutes poursuites afférentes à un non respect desdites garanties, indemnisations comprenant l'aide justiciaire et les autres dépenses encourues.
- Dans le cas d'un article avec des multiples auteur-e-s, illes ont obtenu l'accord de tou-te-s les auteur-e-s pour ce contrat d'édition, qui les lie ; et que tou-te-s les auteur-e-s ont lu et approuvé le contrat ci-dessus.
