Trans People Are Facing Authoritarianism and Eliminationism

Is Critical Scholarship Failing to Respond?

Autores/as

  • Jay Todd University of Glasgow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.eamou6-2682

Palabras clave:

transgender, Supreme Court, EHRC, Sullivan Review, trans geographies

Resumen

We stand at a perilous juncture wherein trans and gender diverse people in the UK and beyond are increasingly subject to authoritarian and eliminationist political forces. Following the UK Supreme Court judgement of April 2025 and amid the continual emergence of political and policy apparatuses that increasingly call for heightened control, surveillance, and restriction of the scope of trans people’s lives, including the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission’s Code of Practice, and the ‘Cass’ and ‘Sullivan’ Reviews, in this piece I ask: are critical scholars failing to act with urgency to protect trans people when most needed? I argue that critical scholars should resist the installation of logics that enforce rigid, hygienically-policed sex/gender binaries, question individuals’ selfhoods and autonomy, and undermine ethical standards, recognising in turn the consequences these hold for all marginalised groups and for conducting critical social science research. Moments of solidarity demonstrate the influence that critical scholars can wield to address the emergency nature of this moment, and to ensure that trans people and trans research can be valued and maintained within the academy. Failing to do so risks the loss of trans scholars and trans scholarship, one that critical scholars would carry as their failure and burden.

Citas

Bender-Baird, Kyla. 2016. “Peeing under surveillance: bathrooms, gender policing, and hate violence,” Gender, Place and Culture, 23(7): 983-988.

Brice, Sage. 2023. “Making space for a radical trans imagination: Towards a kinder, more vulnerable, geography,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(4): 592-599.

Browne, Kath. 2004. “Genderism and the Bathroom Problem: (re)materialising sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies,” Gender, Place and Culture, 11(3): 331–346.

Cass, Hillary. 2024. “Independent review of gender identity services for children and young people: Final report,” https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

Council of Europe. 2025. “United Kingdom: tackling poverty is crucial to protect children’s human rights; a number of other areas also call for attention,” Council of Europe, 8 July 2025, https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/united-kingdom-tackling-poverty-is-crucial-to-protect-children-s-human-rights-a-number-of-other-areas-also-call-for-attention

Doan, Petra L. 2010. The tyranny of gendered spaces – reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place and Culture, 17(5): 635–654.

Gieseking, Jack. 2023. Reflections on a cis discipline. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(4): 571-591.

Kinkaid, Eden. 2024. “Will we avert geography’s ‘trans failure’?,” American Association of Geographers, 26 February 2024, https://www.aag.org/will-we-avert-geographys-trans-failure/

Lemkin Institute. 2025a. “Red Flag Alert on Anti-trans and intersex Rights in the UK,” Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, 30 July 2025, https://www.lemkininstitute.com/_files/ugd/bb6a09_549b26db7fe641d082d917ab083af871.pdf

Lemkin Institute. 2025b. “Statement on the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission: Violation of the Paris Principles and erosion of protections for transgender and intersex people,” Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, 5 September 2025, https://www.lemkininstitute.com/statements-new-page/statement-on-the-uk%E2%80%99s-equality-and-human-rights-commission%3A-violation-of-the-paris-principles-and-erosion-of-protections-for-transgender-and-intersex-people

Marshall, Lo. 2021. Navigating gender diverse worlds assembled upon binary expectations: Investigating the experiences of trans people living in Britain. Doctoral thesis, University College London

McNamara, Meridithe et al. 2024. “An evidence-based critique of ‘The Cass Review’ on gender-affirming care for adolescent gender dysphoria,” https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf

Namaste, K. 1996. “Genderbashing: Sexuality, Gender, and the Regulation of Public Space,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(2): 221-240.

Newnham College, University of Cambridge. 2025. “Research Fellowships,” Archived 8 October 2025, http://archive.today/4lQPv

Noone, Chris et al. 2025. “Critically appraising the Cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25(1): 1-18.

Rabesandratana, Tania. 2023. “U.K. government vow to end ‘woke’ science draws rebuke from researchers,” Science, 17 October 2023, https://www.science.org/content/article/uk-government-vow-end-woke-science-draws-rebuke-researchers

RGS–IBG (2025). “Letter to Jay Todd and signatories,” Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers, 8 May 2025, https://www.rgs.org/media/rumia1mb/rgs-response-to-open-letter-re-sc-ehrc.pdf

RGS-IBG (2025b). “Response: EHRC code of practice for services, public functions and associations,” Royal Geographical Society with Institute of British Geographers, https://www.rgs.org/about-us/what-is-geography/consultations/ehrc-code-of-practice-for-services-public-functions-and-associations

Rosenberg, Rae. (2023). “On surviving a cis discipline,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 41(4): 600–605.

Smith, Matt C., Gilchrist, Paul and Lim, Jason. 2023. “Planning in the ‘LGBTQ Capital’: Choreographing Transgender In and Out of Policy,” Urban Planning, 8(2): 197–207.

Somerville, Shirley-Anne. 2025. “Supreme Court Judgement - For Women Scotland vs Scottish Ministers: Social Justice Secretary Statement,” Scottish Government, 22 April 2025, https://www.gov.scot/publications/supreme-court-judgement-for-women-scotland-vs-scottish-ministers-social-justice-secretary-statement-22-april-2025/

Sullivan, Alice. 2025a. “Review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender: Report 1,” Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, 19 March 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67d98b8a4ba412c67701ed92/review-of-data-statistics-research-on-sex-and-gender.pdf.

Sullivan, Alice. 2025b. “Review of data, statistics and research on sex and gender: Report2: Barriers to research on sex and gender,” Sullivan Review website, https://www.sullivanreview.uk/barriers.pdf

Supreme Court. 2025. Judgment: For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent), Given on 16 April 2025, The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2024_0042_judgment_aea6c48cee.pdf

Todd, Jay J.D. 2021. “Exploring trans people's lives in Britain, trans studies, geography and beyond: A review of research progress,” Geography Compass, 15(4): e12556.

Todd, Jay J.D. 2024. “Exploring young trans people's everyday experiences of ‘out‐of‐placeness’ and socio‐bodily dysphoria,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 49(2), e12662.

Todd, Jay J.D. 2025. “Intervention—533 Geographers Call for Action on Transphobic Developments in the UK, its Supreme Court, and the EHRC,” Antipode Foundation, 6 May 2025, https://antipodeonline.org/2025/05/06/533-geographers-call-for-action/

Todd, Jay J.D. and Callard, Felicity. 2026. “A critical response to the UK’s ‘Sullivan Review’ into sex and gender in research and data,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.

TransActual. 2025. “Trans segregation in practice: Experiences of trans segregation following the Supreme Court ruling,” TransActual, August 2025, https://transactual.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Trans-Segregation-in-Practice.pdf

Descargas

Publicado

2026-03-19

Cómo citar

Todd, J. (2026). Trans People Are Facing Authoritarianism and Eliminationism: Is Critical Scholarship Failing to Respond?. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 25(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.eamou6-2682

Número

Sección

SI: What is Critical Geography, What Can, and What Must It Be?