Les organes commémoratifs de la tentative de coup d'État de juillet 2016 en Turquie
reproduire des sujets citoyens à travers des actes de mémoire
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v21i5.1973Mots-clés :
identité nationale, l'incarnation, Mémoire, La TurquieRésumé
Cet article s'appuie sur des observations paysagères et une analyse du discours pour examiner les monuments publics, les expositions de musées et les récits construits ou publiés depuis une tentative de coup d'État en juillet 2016 en Turquie. Ce faisant, cet article fournit une analyse critique des commémorations officielles qui ont étayé bon nombre des transformations politiques et sociales du pays. Il se concentre sur une dimension spécifique de ces commémorations: le déploiement de ce que je décris comme le «corps commémoratif». Le présent article présente deux arguments liés. Premièrement, accorder une plus grande attention aux corps commémoratifs de la tentative de coup d'État fournit une lentille analytique plus nuancée pour comprendre le récent «virage autoritaire» du pays. Deuxièmement, ces corps commémoratifs sont importants parce qu'ils reflètent et aident à reproduire un modèle particulier de citoyen sujet: martial, patriarcal, pieux et éloigné d'une politique de classe. Bien que l'utilisation de corps commémoratifs ne soit pas nécessairement unique au moment présent, cette étude montre comment une nouvelle forme de politique est pratiquée à travers ces actes de mémoire.
Références
“15 Temmuz Darbe Girişimi: 2 - Darbe Planın Safhaları.” 2016. Retrieved from https://www.yenisafak.com/15temmuz/2016-07-15-22-00/
“15 Temmuz Şehitleri - Gazileri kimler? 15 Temmuz şehit ve gazi sayısı kaç kişi, isimleri neler?” 2020, July 15. Milliyet. Retrieved from https://www.milliyet.com.tr/gundem/15-temmuz-sehit-ve-gazi-sayisi-kac-isimleri-neler-6259322
Açıksöz, Salih Can. 2012. “Sacrificial Limbs of Sovereignty: Disabled Veterans, Masculinity, and Nationalist Politics in Turkey.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 26, no. 1: 4-25. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1387.2011.01194.x
Adams, Paul. 2010. “A taxonomy for communication geography.” Progress in Human Geography 35, no. 1: 37-57.
Ahıska, Meltem. 2011. “Monsters that remember: Tracing the story of the workers’ monument in Tophane, İstanbul.” Red Thread 3: 1-23.
Alimen, Nazlı. 2018. Faith and Fashion in Turkey: Consumption, Politics and Islamic Identities. London: I.B. Tauris.
Altınay, Ayşe Gül. 2004. The myth of the military-nation: militarism, gender, and education in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Altınay, Ayşe Gül. 2018. “Undoing academic cultures of militarism.” Current Anthropology 60, no. 19: S15-S25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/700182
Altınay, Ayşe Gül, and Maria Jose Contreras, Marianne Hirsch, Jean Howard, Banu Karaca, & Alisa Solomon, eds. 2019. Women mobilizing memory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Altınordu, Ateş. 2017. “A Midsummer Night’s Coup: Performance and Power in Turkey’s July 15 Coup Attempt.” Qualitative Sociology 40, no. 2: 139-164. doi:10.1007/s11133-017-9354-y
Asad, Talal. 1986. The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Washington D.C.: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.
Atalan-Helicke, Nurcan. 2015. “The halal paradox: negotiating identity, religious values, and genetically engineered food in Turkey.” Agriculture and Human Values 32, no. 4: 663-674. doi:10.1007/s10460-015-9585-z
Atkinson, David, & Denis Cosgrove. 1998. “Urban Rhetoric and Embodied Identities: City, Nation, and Empire at the Vittorio Emanuele II Monument in Rome, 1870-1945.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88, no. 1: 28-49.
Azaryahu, Maoz. 1993. “From remains to relics: authentic monuments in the Israeli landscape.” History and Memory 5, no. 2: 82-103.
Baser, Bahar, Samim Akgönül, & Ahmet Erdi Öztürk. 2017. “‘Academics for Peace’ in Turkey: a case of criminalising dissent and critical thought via counterterrorism policy.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 10, no, 2: 274-296. doi:10.1080/17539153.2017.1326559
Batuman, Bülent. 2010. The shape of the nation: Visual production of nationalism through maps in Turkey. Political Geography 29, no. 4: 220-234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.05.002
Batuman, Bülent. 2018. New Islamist architecture and urbanism: negotiating nation and Islam through built environment in Turkey. New York: Routledge.
Bianet. 2019. Media Ownership Monitor: Turkey. Retrieved from https://turkey.mom-rsf.org/
Bodnar, John. 1992. Remaking America: public memory, commemoration, and patriotism in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bulut, Ergin, & Başak Can. 2019. “Turkey’s failed coup as an ‘ongoing media event’ and the formation of public affect.” Media, Culture & Society 41, no. 1: 149-157.
Bulut, Ergin, & Başak Can. 2020. “Media, Affect, and Authoritarian Futures in ‘New Turkey’: Spectacular Confessions on Television in the Post-Coup Era.” Communication, Culture & Critique 13, no. 4: 403-421. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcaa022
Cagaptay, Soner. 2017. The new sultan: Erdogan and the crisis of modern Turkey. London: I.B. Tauris.
Carney, Josh. 2018. “Resur(e)recting a Spectacular Hero: Diriliş Ertuğrul, Necropolitics, and Popular Culture in Turkey.” Review of Middle East Studies 52, no. 1: 93-114. doi:10.1017/rms.2018.6
Carney, Josh. 2019. “Projecting ‘New Turkey’ deflecting the coup: squares, screens, and publics at Turkey’s ‘democracy watches’.” Media, Culture & Society 41, no. 1: 138-148.
Casey, Edward S. 2004. “Public memory in place and time.” In Framing public memory, edited by Kendall Phillips, 18-44. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Çaylı, Eray. 2015. “Diyarbakır’s ‘witness sites’ and discourses on the ‘Kurdish question’ in Turkey.” In The Kurdish issue in Turkey, edited by Zeynep Gambetti and Joost Jongerden, 63-92. London: Routledge.
Çaylı, Eray. 2020. “The Politics of Spatial Testimony: The Role of Space in Witnessing Martyrdom and Shame During and After a Widely Televised and Collectively Perpetrated Arson Attack in Turkey.” Space and Culture, 1-14. doi:10.1177/1206331220906090
Çiçekoglu, Feride, & Ömer Turan, eds. 2019. The dubious case of a failed coup: militarism, masculinities and 15 July in Turkey. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Çınar, Alev. 2001. “National History as a Contested Site: The Conquest of Istanbul and Islamist Negotiations of the Nation.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 43, no. 2: 364-391.
Çınar, Alev. 2005. Modernity, Islam, and secularism in Turkey: bodies, places, and time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Denny, Walter B. 1982. Atatürk and political art in Turkey. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 6, no. 2: 17-20.
DeLyser, Dydia. 1999. “Authenticity on the Ground: Engaging the Past in a California Ghost Town.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89, no. 4: 602-632.
DeSilvey, Caitlin. 2006. “Observed Decay: Telling Stories with Mutable Things.” Journal of Material Culture 11, no. 3: 318-338. doi:10.1177/1359183506068808
Dickinson, Greg, Carole Blair, and Brian L. Ott, eds. 2010. Places of public memory: the rhetoric of museums and memorials. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
Dittmer, Jason. 2010. “Textual and Discourse Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography, edited by Dydia DeLyser, Steve Herbert, Mike Crang, and Linda McDowell, 274-286. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Drozdzewski, Danielle. 2012. “Knowing (or Not) about Katyń: The Silencing and Surfacing of Public Memory.” Space and Polity 16, no. 3: 303-319. doi:10.1080/13562576.2012.733570
Duncan, Nancy, & Duncan, James. 2010. “Doing Landscape Interpretation.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography, edited by Dydia DeLyser, Steve Herbert, Mike Crang, and Linda McDowell, 225-248. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Erensü, Sinan, & Ayça Alemdaroğlu. 2018. “Dialectics of Reform and Repression: Unpacking Turkey's Authoritarian ‘Turn’”. Review of Middle East Studies 52, no. 1: 16-28. doi:10.1017/rms.2018.8
Esen, Berk, & Şebnem Gümüşçü. 2016. “Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 9: 1581-1606. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732
Esen, Berk, & Şebnem Gümüşçü. 2017a. “A Small Yes for Presidentialism: The Turkish Constitutional Referendum of April 2017.” South European Society and Politics 22, no. 3: 303-326. doi:10.1080/13608746.2017.1384341
Esen, Berk, & Şebnem Gümüşçü. 2017b. “Turkey: How the Coup Failed.” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 1: 59-73. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0006
Foote, Kenneth E., & Maoz Azaryahu. 2007. “Toward a geography of memory: geographical dimensions of public memory and commemoration.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 35, no. 1: 125-144.
Forest, Benjamin, & Juliet Johnson. 2011. “Monumental Politics: Regime Type and Public Memory in Post-Communist States.” Post-Soviet Affairs 27, no. 3: 269-288. doi:10.2747/1060-586X.27.3.269
Freeman, Lindsey A., Benjamin Nienass, & Rachel Daniell. 2015. Memory | Materiality | Sensuality. Memory Studies 9, no. 1: 3-12. doi:10.1177/1750698015613969
Gencer, Yasemin. 2012. “We Are Family: The Child and Modern Nationhood in Early Turkish Republican Cartoons (1923–28).” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 32, no. 2: 294-309.
Gökarıksel, Banu. 2012. “The intimate politics of secularism and the headscarf: the mall, the neighborhood, and the public square in Istanbul.” Gender, Place and Culture 19, no. 1: 1-20.
Gökarıksel, Banu, Yeşim Arat, Salih Can Açıksöz, Zeynep Kurtuluş Korkman, Begüm Başdaş, & Feyza Akınerdem. 2017. “Special Forum: Feminist Perspectives on the 2016 Military Coup Attempt in Turkey.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 13, no. 1: 173-193.
Gökarıksel, Saygun, & Z. Umut Türem. 2019. “The Banality of Exception? Law and Politics in ‘Post-Coup’ Turkey.” South Atlantic Quarterly 118, no. 1: 175-187. doi:10.1215/00382876-7281684
Göksu, M. Davut, & Nevzat Yıldırım. 2017. 15 Temmuz Şehitleri. Istanbul: Kültür A.Ş.
Göle, Nilüfer. 2002. “Islam in public: New visibilities and new imaginaries.” Public Culture 14, no. 1: 173-190.
Hamilakis, Yannis, & Jo Labanyi. 2008. “Introduction: Time, Materiality, and the Work of Memory.” History and Memory 20, no. 2: 5-17.
Hammond, Timur. 2019. “The politics of perspective: subjects, exhibits, and spectacle in Taksim Square, Istanbul.” Urban Geography 40, no. 7: 1039-1054. doi:10.1080/02723638.2019.1640033
Hammond, Timur. 2020. “Making Memorial Publics: Media, Monuments, and The Politics of Commemoration Following Turkey’s July 2016 Coup Attempt.” Geographical Review 110, no. 4: 536-555. doi:10.1080/00167428.2019.1702429
Henkel, Heiko. 2007. “The location of Islam: Inhabiting Istanbul in a Muslim way.” American Ethnologist 34, no. 1: 57-70.
Hetherington, Kevin. 1997. “Museum topology and the will to connect.” Journal of Material Culture 2, no. 2: 199-218.
Hoelscher, Steven, & Derek H. Alderman. 2004. “Memory and place: geographies of a critical relationship.” Social & Cultural Geography 5, no. 3: 347–355.
Hoskins, Gareth. 2007. “Materialising Memory at Angel Island Immigration Station, San Francisco.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39, no. 2: 437-455. doi:10.1068/a38174
Houston, Christopher. 2001. “The Brewing of Islamist Modernity: Tea Gardens and Public Space in Istanbul.” Theory, Culture, and Society 18, no. 6: 77-97.
Houston, Christopher. 2015. “How Globalization Really Happens: Remembering Activism in the Transformation of Istanbul.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39, no. 1: 46-61. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12157
Houston, Christopher. 2018. “Plotters and Martyrs: The Justice and Development Party's (AKP) Constituting of Political Actors in the 15 July Coup Event.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 19, no. 4: 531-545. doi:10.1080/21567689.2018.1537623
Insel, Ahmet, & Béatrice Hibou. 2018. “Osman Kavala, voix culturelle des sans-voix. Sociétés politiques comparées 43, no. 9-12: 1-9.
Jadaliyya Reports. 2021, November 4. “International Call for Solidarity: Boğaziçi University Academics Begin the 2021 Fall Term Under Assault.” Jadaliyya. Retrieved from https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/43489.
Johnson, Nuala. 1995. “Cast in stone: monuments, geography, and nationalism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13, no. 1: 51-65.
Johnson, Nuala. 2004. Public memory. In A Companion to Cultural Geography edited by James S. Duncan, Nuala Johnson, & Richard H. Schein, 316-327. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Kansu-Yetkiner, Neslihan. 2019. “Politics of collective memory in education: Atatürk corners in Turkish schools.” History of Education & Children’s Literature 14, no. 1: 109-125.
Karacas, Cary. 2010). Place, public memory, and the Tokyo air raids. Geographical Review, 100(4), 521-537.
Karaman, Emine Rezzan. 2016. “Remember, S/he Was Here Once.” Journal of Middle East Women's Studies 12, no. 3: 382-410. doi:10.1215/15525864-3637576
Karaveli, Halil. 2018. Why Turkey is authoritarian: from Atatürk to Erdoğan. London: Pluto Press.
Kemerli, Pınar. 2019. Necropolitics, Martyrdom and Muslim Conscientious Objection. In Turkey’s Necropolitical Laboratory, edited by Banu Bargu, 139-159. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kocamaner, Hikmet. 2019. Regulating the family through religion: secularism, Islam, and the politics of the family in contemporary Turkey. American Ethnologist 46, no. 4: 1-14.
Koch, Natalie. 2013a. “Introduction - Field methods in ‘closed contexts’: undertaking research in authoritarian states and places.” Area 45, no. 4: 390-395. doi:10.1111/area.12044
Koch, Natalie. 2013b. Sport and soft authoritarian nation-building. Political Geography, 32: 42-51. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.11.006
Koch, Natalie. 2019. “Post-triumphalist Geopolitics: Liberal Selves, Authoritarian Others.” ACME 18, no. 4: 909-924.
Lizotte, Christopher. 2019. Where are the people? Refocusing political geography on populism. Political Geography 71: 139-141. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.12.007
Massey, Doreen. 1995. “Places and their pasts.” History Workshop Journal 39: 182-192.
McDowell, Sara. 2008. “Commemorating dead ‘men’: gendering the past and present in post-conflict Northern Ireland.” Gender, Place & Culture 15, no. 4: 335-354. doi:10.1080/09663690802155546
Neyzi, Leyla, ed. 2011. Nasıl Hatırlıyoruz? Türkiye’de Bellek Çalışmaları. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
Ogborn, Miles. 2002. “Writing travels: power, knowledge and ritual on the English East India Company’s early voyages.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27, no. 2: 155-171.
Oguz, Zeynep. 2021. “Cavernous politics: Geopower, territory, and the Kurdish question in Turkey.” Political Geography 85: 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102331
Olick, Jeffrey K. 2008. “‘Collective memory’: A memoir and prospect.” Memory Studies 1, no. 1: 23-29. doi:10.1177/1750698007083885
Özpek, Burak Bilgehan, & Nebahat Tanriverdi Yaşar. 2017. “Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule.” Turkish Studies 19, no. 2: 198-216. doi:10.1080/14683849.2017.1400912
Özyürek, Esra. 2004. “Miniaturizing Atatürk: Privatization of State Imagery and Ideology in Turkey.” American Ethnologist 31, no. 3: 374-391.
Özyürek, Esra. 2016, August 18. “Commemorating the Failed Coup in Turkey.” Jadaliyya. Retrieved from http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/24963/commemorating-the-failed-coup-in-turkey
Özyürek, Esra, ed. 2007. The politics of public memory in Turkey. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Phillips, Kendall, ed. 2004. Framing Public Memory. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Rose, Gillian. 2009. “Who cares for which dead and how? British newspaper reporting of the bombings in London, July 2005.” Geoforum 40, no. 1: 46-54. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.01.002
Rose-Redwood, Reuben, Derek Alderman & Maoz Azaryahu. 2008. “Collective memory and the politics of urban space: an introduction.” GeoJournal 73, no. 1: 161-164.
Sertdemir Özdemir, Seçkin, & Esra Özyürek. 2019. “Civil and civic death in the new authoritarianisms: punishment of dissidents through juridical destruction, ethical ruin, and necropolitics in Turkey.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 46, no. 5: 699-713. doi:10.1080/13530194.2019.1634390
Sertdemir Özdemir, Seçkin, Nil Mutluer & Esra Özyürek. 2019. “Exile and Plurality in Neoliberal Times.” Public Culture 31, no. 2: 235-259. doi:10.1215/08992363-7286801
Schatz, Edward. 2009. “The soft authoritarian tool kit: Agenda-setting power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.” Comparative Politics 41, no. 2: 203-222.
Shively, Kim. 2005. “Religious bodies and the secular state: the Merve Kavakci affair.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 1, no. 3: 46-72.
Smith, Samuel A., & Kenneth E. Foote. 2016. “Museum/space/discourse: analyzing discourse in three dimensions in Denver’s History Colorado Center.” Cultural Geographies 24, no. 1: 131-148. doi:10.1177/1474474016663930
Solomonovich, Nadav. 2021. “‘Democracy and National Unity Day’ in Turkey - the Invention of a New National Holiday.” New Perspectives on Turkey 64, no. 1: 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2020.33
Soylu, Ragip. 2019, September 24. “Turkish court cases over ‘insulting’ the president up 30 percent in 2018.” Middle East Eye. Retrieved from https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/26000-people-investigated-insulting-erdogan-2018
Sözen, Yunus. 2019. “Competition in a Populist Authoritarian Regime: The June 2018 Dual Elections in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 24, no. 3: 287-315. doi:10.1080/13608746.2019.1688515
Sözen, Yunus. 2020. “Studying autocratization in Turkey: political institutions, populism, and neoliberalism.” New Perspectives on Turkey, 1-27. doi:10.1017/npt.2020.26
Sumartojo, Shanti, & Matthew Graves. 2018. “Rust and dust: Materiality and the feel of memory at Camp des Milles.” Journal of Material Culture 23, no. 3: 328-343.
Sumartojo, Shanti, & Matthew Graves. 2021. “Feeling through the screen: memory sites, affective entanglements, and digital materialities.” Social & Cultural Geography, 22, no. 2: 231-249. doi:10.1080/14649365.2018.1563711
Şünbüloğlu, Nurseli Yeşim. 2019. “Contending sacrifices: discontent of military veterans of the Kurdish conflict for civilian veterans of 15 July.” In The dubious case of a failed coup: militarism, masculinities, and 15 July in Turkey edited by Feride Çiçekoglu & Ömer Turan, 41-70. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tansel, Cemal Burak. 2018. “Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the Narratives of Progress.” South European Society and Politics 23, no. 2: 197-217. doi:10.1080/13608746.2018.1479945
Tee, Caroline. 2018. The Gülen Movement and the AK Party: The Rise and Fall of a Turkish Islamist Alliance. In Turkey’s July 15th Coup: What Happened and Why, edited by M. Hakan Yavuz & Bayram Balcı, 150-172. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
“Tek Millet, Tek Bayrak, Tek Vatan, Tek Devlet İçin Evet”. 2017, February 11. Retrieved from https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/70982/tek-millet-tek-bayrak-tek-vatan-tek-devlet-icin-evet
Teoman, Can. 2020, September 18. “15 Temmuz sonrası el konulan mal-mülk 32 milyar dolar! [32 billion dollars of goods and property seized following July 15!].” Ahval. Retrieved from https://ahvalnews.com/tr/arastirma/15-temmuz-sonrasi-el-konulan-mal-mulk-miktari-32-milyar-dolar
Till, Karen E. 1999. “Staging the past: landscape designs, cultural identity and Erinnerungspolitik at Berlin's Neue Wache.” cultural geographies 6, no. 3: 251-283. doi:10.1177/096746089900600302
Till, Karen E. 2003. “Places of memory.” In A companion to political geography, edited by John Agnew, Katharyne Mitchell, & Gerard Toal, 289-301. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Tuğal, Cihan. 2012. “‘Serbest meslek sahibi”: Neoliberal subjectivity among İstanbul's popular sectors.” New Perspectives on Turkey 46: 65-93. doi:10.1017/S0896634600001515
Waldman, Simon, & Caliskan, Emre. 2017. The New Turkey and Its Discontents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walton, Jeremy F. 2010. Practices of Neo-Ottomanism: Making Space and Place Virtuous in Istanbul. In Orienting Istanbul: Cultural Capital of Europe? edited by Deniz Göktürk, Levent Soysal, & İpek Türeli, 88-103. New York: Routledge.
Watmough, Simon P., & Ahmet Erdi Öztürk. 2018. “The Future of the Gülen Movement in Transnational Political Exile: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 19, no. 1: 1-10. doi:10.1080/21567689.2018.1453244
Wilson, Christopher S. 2016. Beyond Anitkabir: the funerary architecture of Ataturk: the construction and maintenance of national memory. New York: Routledge.
Yabanci, Bilge. 2020. “Fuzzy Borders between Populism and Sacralized Politics: Mission, Leader, Community and Performance in ‘New’ Turkey.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 21, no. 1: 92-112. doi:10.1080/21567689.2020.1736046
Yanık, Lerna K., & Fulya Hisarlıoğlu. 2019. “‘They wrote history with their bodies’: Necrogeopolitics, Necropolitical Spaces and the Everyday Spatial Politics of Death in Turkey.” In Turkey's Necropolitical Laboratory, edited by Banu Bargu, 46-70. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yavuz, M. Hakan, & Bayram Balcı, eds. 2018. Turkey’s July 15th Coup: What Happened and Why. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
Yeşil, Bilge. 2018. “Authoritarian Turn or Continuity? Governance of Media through Capture and Discipline in the AKP Era.” South European Society and Politics 23, no. 2: 239-257. doi:10.1080/13608746.2018.1487137
Yılmaz, Ihsan. 2018. “Islamic Populism and Creating Desirable Citizens in Erdogan’s New Turkey.” Mediterranean Quarterly 29, no. 4: 52-76. doi:10.1215/10474552-7345451
Zengin, Huseyin, & Hakan Ovunc Ongur. 2019. “How sovereign is a populist? The nexus between populism and political economy of the AKP.” Turkish Studies 21, no. 4: 578-595. doi:10.1080/14683849.2019.1691921
Zhang, J. J., & Mike Crang. 2016. “Making material memories: Kinmen’s bridging objects and fractured places between China and Taiwan.” cultural geographies 23, no. 3: 421-439. doi:10.1177/1474474015591488
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Timur Hammond 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Les auteur-e-s publiant dans ACME le font aux conditions de la licence canadienne Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works". En conséquence, les auteur-e-s gardent les droits sur leur texte, ainsi que celui d'être identifié-e-s comme auteur-e-s sans limitation de date. Leur texte peut être partagé librement (soit reproduit, distribué, transmis et publié) dans les conditions suivantes :
- Attribution. La publication originale de ladite oeuvre dans ACME doit être mentionnée et, pour tout usage ou distribution, les termes de sa licence doivent être précisés.
- Non commercial. L'oeuvre ne peut être utilisée à des fins commerciales.
- Pas de travaux dérivés. À l'exception d'usages légitimes dans des buts universitaires ou critiques, l'oeuvre ne peut être altérée ou transformée. À l'exception de la première condition d'attribution à ACME de la publication originale, toutes ces conditions peuvent être levées avec la permission explicite du détenteur du copyright.
(Note: du volume 1(1) au volume 7(2), les auteur-e-s ont donné à ACME un copyright sur leur article limité à la publication dans la revue. Les auteur-e-s gardent le copyright sur leur manuscrit pour toute autre forme de publication, mais doivent mentionner la publication originale dans ACME si le texte est republié ailleurs).
Pour une publication dans ACME, les auteur-e-s déclarent que et se portent garant-e-s que
- leur article est une oeuvre originale, n'a pas été publié avant et n'est pas soumis ailleurs pour publication papier ou électronique sous sa forme finale ;
- Illes ont obtenu l'autorisation de reproduction (papier et électronique) de la part du possesseur des droits de copyright pour tout le matériau qui ne leur appartient pas, et que le possesseur est cité comme source ;
- Leur article ne contient aucun élément violant un copyright existant, le droit d'un tiers, ou quoi que ce soit de nature obscène, indécente, calomniatrice ou en quelque façon illégale ; et, qu'en l'état de leurs connaissance, leur article n'empiète sur les droit de personne.
- Ils ont la charge d'indemniser les rédacteurs et éditeurs d'ACME pour toutes poursuites afférentes à un non respect desdites garanties, indemnisations comprenant l'aide justiciaire et les autres dépenses encourues.
- Dans le cas d'un article avec des multiples auteur-e-s, illes ont obtenu l'accord de tou-te-s les auteur-e-s pour ce contrat d'édition, qui les lie ; et que tou-te-s les auteur-e-s ont lu et approuvé le contrat ci-dessus.
