Feminist Lefebvre? Understanding Urbanization Through the Global Intimate
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v20i4.1891Mots-clés :
Everyday life, abstract space, differential space, maquiladoras, Yucatán, global intimateRésumé
This article follows the life story of Lety, an ex-maquiladora worker from the village of El Refugio in Yucatán, the south of Mexico, from the 1980s until the present in a “global intimate” account. Against the background of two cycles of capital accumulation (i.e., henequen fiber production and a maquiladora chapter), the cross-scalar and historical examination I offer here relies on discourse analysis of governmental reports and state development plans as well as ethnographic research. Operationalizing a feminist-Lefebvrean toolkit, I reflect on how the concepts of abstract space, everyday life, and differential space are challenged or complemented by the global intimate. Through this, the paper explores how the fabric of capitalist urbanization unfolded in the everyday: how it was created, re-created, and challenged. Three main things are highlighted in this analysis: (1) how the space of capitalism was produced at the intersection of materiality, discourse, and lived experience; (2) the contradictions that arise between abstract space and everyday life; and (3) the potentialities of what I refer to as intimate spaces of difference. I conclude with a discussion of how the space of capitalism was challenged by Lety through these intimate spaces of difference, reflecting on the importance of building more theoretical bridges between critical urban theory and feminist scholarship.
Références
Andrews, Anthony P, Rafael Burgos Villanueva, and Luis Millet Cámara. 2012. The Henequen Ports of Yucatan’s Gilded Age . International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16, 25–46.
Arboleda, Martín. 2016. Spaces of Extraction, Metropolitan Explosions: Planetary Urbanization and the Commodity Boom in Latin America . International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40(1), 96–112.
Baños Ramírez, Othón. 2010. The Decline and Collapse of Yucatán’s Henequen Agro-Industry. Neoliberalism Reconsidered. In Edward D. Terry, Ben W. Fallaw, Gilbert M. Joseph, & Edward H. Moseley (eds.) , Peripheral Visions: Politics, Society, and the Challenges of Modernity in Yucatan. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, pp. 144–69.
Blum, Virginia, and Heidi Nast. 1996. Where’ s the difference? The hctcrosexualization of alterity in Henri Lefebvre and Jacques Lacan . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14(5), 559–80.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Table B–110. Foreign exchange rates, 1988–2009. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ERP-2010/pdf/ERP-2010-table110.pdf.
Boffil Gómez, Luis A. 2008. El aeropuerto de Chichén Itzá, un elefante blanco; buscan rescatarlo . La Jornada. http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2008/09/29/index.php?section=estados&article=038n1est.
Brenner, Neil, and Christian Schmid. 2015. Towards a new epistemology of the urban? . City 19(2–3), 151–82.
Buckley, Michelle, and Kendra Strauss. 2016. With, against and beyond Lefebvre: Planetary urbanization and epistemic plurality . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(4), 617–36.
Caldeira, TP. 2017. Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35(1), 3–20.
Canché Escamilla, Jorge Luis. 1998. La industria maquiladora de exportación en Yucatán, México . Comercio Exterior 48(4), 324–27.
Canto Sáenz, Rodolfo. 2001. Del henequén a las maquiladoras. La política industrial en Yucatán 1984-2001. México D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, A.C. / Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.
Canto Sáenz, Rodolfo, and Eraclio Cruz Pacheco. 2004. Las maquiladoras en Yucatán y el Plan Puebla-Panamá . Comercio Exterior 54(4), 328–34.
Carrillo, Jorge, and Robert Zárate. 2009. The evolution of maquiladora best practices: 1965-2008 . Journal of Business Ethics 88(SUPPL. 2), 335–48.
Castilla Ramos, Beatriz, and Alejandra García Quintanilla. 2006. La industria maquiladora de exportación de Yucatán y su especialización en la rama de la confección . El Cotidiano(136), 29–38.
Castilla Ramos, Beatriz, and Beatriz Torres Góngora. 2010. Crisis sobre crisis en la industria maquiladora de exportación y sus consecuencias en la ocupación. El caso de Yucatán . El Cotidiano(162), 43–56.
Cervera Pacheco, Víctor M. 1987. Sexto Informe de Gobierno. Mérida.
COESPY. 2013. Plan Estatal de Desarrollo 2012-2018. Yucatán. Mérida, Yucatán.
CONAGUA. 2002. Reseña del Huracán “Isidore” del Océano Atlántico . Coordinación del Servicio Metereológico Nacional. http://smn1.conagua.gob.mx/ciclones/tempo2002/atlantico/isidore/isidore.html.
Coronil, Fernando. 2000. Towards a Critique of Globalcentrism: Speculations on Capitalism’s Nature . Public Culture 12(2), 351–74.
Evans, Sterling. 2007. Bound in Twine: The History and Ecology of the Henequen-Wheat Complex for Mexico and the American and Canadian Plains, 1880-1950. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Fenster, Tovi. 2005. The Right to the Gendered City: Different Formations of Belonging in Everyday Life . Journal of Gender Studies 14(3), 217–31.
Fonseca Alfaro, Claudia. 2018. The Land of the Magical Maya: Colonial Legacies, Urbanization, and the Unfolding of Global Capitalism. Malmö University.
Gobierno del Estado. 2007. Plan Estatal de Desarrollo 2007 - 2012.
Gobierno del Estado, Yucatán. 1983. Plan de Desarrollo Estatal 83-88.
------. 1996. Plan Estatal de Desarrollo 1995 - 2001. Mérida, Yucatán.
------. 2000. Quinto Informe de Gobierno. Yucatán. 1995-2001. Mérida, Yucatán.
Goonewardena, Kanishka. 2008. Marxism and Everyday Life. On Henri Lefebvre, Guy Debord, and some others. In Kanishka Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, & Christian Schmid (eds.) , Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge, pp. 117–33.
Goonewardena, Kanishka, and Stefan Kipfer. 2005. Spaces of difference: Reflections from Toronto on multiculturalism, bourgeois urbanism and the possibility of radical urban politics . International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29(3), 670–78.
Goonewardena, Kanishka, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, and Christian Schmid. 2008. Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.
Gravel, Nathalie. 2006. Los factores de retención de la maquila: lección de Yucatán (1995-2005) . Desacatos. Revistra de Antropología Social 21(mayo-agosto), 51–66.
INEGI. 2019. Manufacturas por entidad federativa y municipios seleccionados . Estadística Manufacturera y Maquiladora de Exportación. https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/manufacturasexp/default.html#Tabulados.
Jepson, Wendy. 2005. Spaces of labor activism, Mexican-American women and the farm worker movement in South Texas since 1966 . Antipode 37(4), 679–702.
Kipfer, Stefan. 2002. Urbanization, Everyday Life and the Survival of Capitalism: Lefebvre, Gramsci and the Problematic of Hegemony . Capitalism Nature Socialism 13(2), 117–49.
------. 2008. How Lefebvre Urbanized Gramsci. Hegemony, everyday life, and difference. In Kanishka Goonewardena, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, & Christian Schmid (eds.) , Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge, pp. 193–211.
------. 2018. Pushing the limits of urban research: Urbanization, pipelines and counter-colonial politics . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36(3), 474–93.
Kipfer, Stefan, P Saberi, and T Wieditz. 2012. Henri Lefebvre: Debates and controversies . Progress in Human Geography 37(1), 115–34.
Klinenberg, Erick. 1999. Denaturalizing disaster: A social autopsy of the 1995 Chicago heat wave . Theory and Society 28(2), 239–95.
Larkin, Brian. 2013. The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure . Annual Review of Anthropology 42, 327–43.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
------. 2003. The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Loftus, Alex. 2015. Violent geographical abstractions . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33(2), 366–81.
Monte-Mór, Roberto Luís. 2005. What is the urban in the contemporary world? . Cadernos de Saúde Pública 21(3), 942–48.
Moseley, Edward H, and H Delpar. 2008. Yucatán’s Prelude to Globalization. In Eric N. Baklanoff & Edward H. Moseley (eds.) , Yucatán in an Era of Globalization. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, pp. 20–41.
Mountz, Alison, and Jennifer Hyndman. 2006. Feminist Approaches to the Global Intimate . Women’s Studies Quarterly 34(1/2), 446–63.
Müller, Markus-Michael. 2012. Addressing an Ambivalent Relationship: Policing and the Urban Poor in Mexico City . Journal of Latin American Studies 44(02), 319–45.
OECD. 2007. OECD Territorial Reviews, Yucatan, Mexico.
Pain, Rachel, and Lynn Staeheli. 2014. Introduction: intimacy-geopolitics and violence . Area 46(4), 344–47.
Peake, Linda. 2016. On feminism and feminist allies in knowledge production in urban geography . Urban Geography 37(6), 830–38.
Pérez Medina, Susana. 2011. Políticas públicas de combate a la pobreza en Yucatán, 1990-2006 . Gestion y Politica Publicas XX(2), 291–329.
Pratt, Geraldine, and Victoria Rosner. 2006. Introduction: The Global & the Intimate . Women’s Studies Quarterly 34(1/2), 13–24.
------. 2012a. The Global and the Intimate: Feminism in Our Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
------. 2012b. Introduction. The Global and the Intimate. In Geraldine Pratt & Victoria Rosner (eds.) , The Global and the Intimate: Feminism in Our Time. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–27.
Quintal Palomo, Alberto. 2010. Política económica y desarrollo industrial en Yucatán. El caso de la industria manufacturera. Mérida, Yucatán: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.
Roy, Ananya. 2016. What is urban about critical urban theory? . Urban Geography 37(6), 810–23.
Schmid, Christian. 2014. The Trouble with Henri: Urban Research and the Theory of the Production of Space. In Lukasz Stanek, Christian Schmid, & Ákos Moravánszky (eds.) , Urban Revolution Now. Henri Lefebvre in Social Research and Architecture. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited, pp. 27–48.
Schmid, Christian, Lukasz Stanek, and Ákos Moravánszky. 2014. Introduction: Theory, Not Method - Thinking with Lefebvre. In Lukasz Stanek, Christian Schmid, & Ákos Moravánszky (eds.) , Urban Revolution Now. Henri Lefebvre in Social Research and Architecture. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
SEDATU. 2014. Programa Regional de Desarrollo del Sur-Sureste. 2014-2018. México D.F.
SEFOE. 2010. Guía del inversionista. Yucatán 2010.
Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2004. People as Infrastructure . Public Culture 16(3), 407–29.
Topalovic, Milica. 2015. Beyond the Limits of the City: Research and Design of Urbanising Territories. ETH Zurich D-ARCH.
Wainwright, Joel. 2008. Decolonizing Development. Colonial Power and the Maya. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Werner, Marion. 2016. Global Displacements. The Making of Uneven Development in the Caribbean. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Werner, Marion, Kendra Strauss, Brenda Parker, Reecia Orzeck, Kate Derickson, and Anne Bonds. 2017. Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for? . Geoforum 79, 1–4.
Wilson, Ara. 2012. Intimacy: A Useful Category of Transnational Analysis. In Geraldine Pratt & Victoria Rosner (eds.) , The Global and the Intimate: Feminism in Our Time. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 31–56.
------. 2016. The Infrastructure of Intimacy . Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 41(2), 247–80.
Wilson, Japhy. 2013. “The Devastating Conquest of the Lived by the Conceived”: The Concept of Abstract Space in the Work of Henri Lefebvre . Space and Culture 16(3), 364–80.
Wright, Melissa W. 2008. Gender and geography: knowledge and activism across the intimately global. Progress in Human Geography 33(3), 379–86.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteur-e-s publiant dans ACME le font aux conditions de la licence canadienne Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works". En conséquence, les auteur-e-s gardent les droits sur leur texte, ainsi que celui d'être identifié-e-s comme auteur-e-s sans limitation de date. Leur texte peut être partagé librement (soit reproduit, distribué, transmis et publié) dans les conditions suivantes :
- Attribution. La publication originale de ladite oeuvre dans ACME doit être mentionnée et, pour tout usage ou distribution, les termes de sa licence doivent être précisés.
- Non commercial. L'oeuvre ne peut être utilisée à des fins commerciales.
- Pas de travaux dérivés. À l'exception d'usages légitimes dans des buts universitaires ou critiques, l'oeuvre ne peut être altérée ou transformée. À l'exception de la première condition d'attribution à ACME de la publication originale, toutes ces conditions peuvent être levées avec la permission explicite du détenteur du copyright.
(Note: du volume 1(1) au volume 7(2), les auteur-e-s ont donné à ACME un copyright sur leur article limité à la publication dans la revue. Les auteur-e-s gardent le copyright sur leur manuscrit pour toute autre forme de publication, mais doivent mentionner la publication originale dans ACME si le texte est republié ailleurs).
Pour une publication dans ACME, les auteur-e-s déclarent que et se portent garant-e-s que
- leur article est une oeuvre originale, n'a pas été publié avant et n'est pas soumis ailleurs pour publication papier ou électronique sous sa forme finale ;
- Illes ont obtenu l'autorisation de reproduction (papier et électronique) de la part du possesseur des droits de copyright pour tout le matériau qui ne leur appartient pas, et que le possesseur est cité comme source ;
- Leur article ne contient aucun élément violant un copyright existant, le droit d'un tiers, ou quoi que ce soit de nature obscène, indécente, calomniatrice ou en quelque façon illégale ; et, qu'en l'état de leurs connaissance, leur article n'empiète sur les droit de personne.
- Ils ont la charge d'indemniser les rédacteurs et éditeurs d'ACME pour toutes poursuites afférentes à un non respect desdites garanties, indemnisations comprenant l'aide justiciaire et les autres dépenses encourues.
- Dans le cas d'un article avec des multiples auteur-e-s, illes ont obtenu l'accord de tou-te-s les auteur-e-s pour ce contrat d'édition, qui les lie ; et que tou-te-s les auteur-e-s ont lu et approuvé le contrat ci-dessus.
