Climate Mathematics
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v18i4.1719Mots-clés :
climate, mathematics, politics, algebra, fractals, geometryRésumé
This essay is a critical response to Geoff Mann and Joel Wainwright’s (2018) Climate Leviathan. It focuses on the political alternative fleshed out towards the end of the book: “Climate X.” For Mann and Wainwright, X is a variable to “solve for.” I seek to take this seriously as a mathematical statement, exploring the extent to which a politics of Climate X can be considered algebraic, especially in light of Mann and Wainwright’s references to “fragments” in the work of Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin. The book’s algebraic approach, I argue, reduces the fragment (X), and politics along with it, to something numerable. From a different reading of Adorno and Benjamin, I show how two other fields of mathematics—set theory and fractal geometry—help address some of the pitfalls of Climate X, while pointing towards another climate politics that embraces deviation, infinity, and nothingness.
Références
Adorno TW (1984) [1932] The Idea of Natural History. Telos 60(Summer): 111–124.
Adorno TW (2013) Aesthetic Theory. London: Bloomsbury.
Althusser L (2006) Philosophy of the Encounter: Later Writings, 1978–87. London: Verso.
Badiou A (2006) Logics of Worlds: Being and Event II. London: Bloomsbury.
Badiou A (2007) [1988] Being and Event. London: Continuum.
Barad K (2012) What Is the Measure of Nothingness: Infinity, Virtuality, Justice: 100 Notes, 100 Thoughts: Documenta Series 099. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
Bargu B (2012) In the Theater of Politics: Althusser’s Aleatory Materialism and Aesthetics. Diacritics 40(3): 86–113.
Barnes T (2019) Not Only … But Also: Urban Mathematical Models and Urban Social Theory. In: D’Acci L (ed) The Mathematics of Urban Morphology. New York: Springer, 491–497.
Bartos AE (2018) Relational spaces and relational care: Campus sexual violence, intimate geopolitics and topological polis. Area, DOI: 10.1111/area.12449.
Benjamin W (1996) The Concept of Criticism in German Romanticism. Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913–1926. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 116–200.
Benjamin W (1998) The Origin of German Tragic Drama. London: Verso
Benjamin W (2006) The Land Where the Proletariat May Not Be Mentioned: The Premier of Eight One-Act Plays by Brecht. In: Selected Writings, Volume 3: 1935 –1938. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 330–334.
Bernes J (2019) Between the Devil and the Green New Deal. Commune. https://communemag.com/between-the-devil-and-the-green-new-deal/.
Bhandar B (2018) Colonial Lives of Property: Law, Land, and Racial Regimes of Ownership. Duke University Press.
Billé, F (2018) Skinworlds: Borders, haptics, topologies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36(1): 60–77.
Bishop AJ (1990) Western mathematics: the secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race & Class, 32(2): 51–65.
Bloch E (1970) A Philosophy of the Future. New York: Herder and Herder.
Brown C & Liebovitch L (2010) Fractal Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Clemens J (2011) Work of Giorgio Agamben. Edinburgh University Press.
Dauphiné A (2012) Fractal Geography. Hoboken: Wiley.
Fenves P (2011) Messianic Reduction: Walter Benjamin and the Shape of Time. Stanford University Press.
Ford TH (2016) Climate change and literary history. In: Bristow T & Ford TH (eds) A Cultural History of Climate Change. London: Routledge.
Foucault M (2005) The Order of Things. London: Routledge.
Harvey D (1969) Explanation in Geography. London: Edward Arnold.
Herman RDK (2008) Reflections on the Importance of Indigenous Geography. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 32(3): 73–88.
Jesseph D (1999) Squaring the Circle: The War Between Hobbes and Wallis. University of Chicago Press.
Khatib S (2013) A Non-Nullified Nothingness: Walter Benjamin and the Messianic. Stasis 1(1). http://www.stasisjournal.net/index.php/journal/article/view/56.
Lanoiselée Y, Nivanen L, Kaabouchi AE, & Wang QA (2018) Composition of Fractals. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1113: 012013.
Laugwitz D (2009) Bernhard Riemann 1826–1866: Turning Points in the Conception of Mathematics. New York: Springer.
Lukinbeal C (2004) The map that precedes the territory: An introduction to essays in cinematic geography GeoJournal 59(4): 247–251.
MacFarlane K (2017) A thousand CEOs: Relational thought, processual space, and Deleuzian ontology in human geography and strategic management. Progress in Human Geography 41(3): 299–320.
MacFarlane K (2019) Time, Waste, and the City: The Rise of the Environmental Industry. Antipode 51(1): 225–247.
Mandelbrot BB (1982) The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: WH Freeman.
Mandelbrot BB (2012) The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick. New York: Vintage Books.
Mann G (2008) A Negative Geography of Necessity. Antipode 40(5): 921–934.
Mann G & Wainwright J (2018) Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London: Verso.
Marston S.A, Jones, JP & Woodward K (2005) Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30(4): 416–432.
Marston SA (2000) The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography 24(2): 219–242.
Martin L & Secor A (2014) Towards a post-mathematical topology. Progress in Human Geography 38(3): 420–438.
Marx K (1992) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, volume 1. London: Penguin.
Mitchell K & Kallio KP (2017) Spaces of the Geosocial: Exploring Transnational Topologies. Geopolitics 22(1): 1–14.
Mitchell K, Marston SA & Katz C (2004) Life’s Work: Geographies of Social Reproduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mountz A (2011) Where asylum-seekers wait: feminist counter-topographies of sites between states. Gender, Place & Culture 18(3): 381–399.
Neel PA (2018) Hinterland: America’s New Landscape of Class and Conflict. Reaktion Books.
O’Sullivan D, Bergmann L & Thatcher, JE (2018) Spatiality, Maps, and Mathematics in Critical Human Geography: Toward a Repetition with Difference. The Professional Geographer 70(1): 129–139.
Paasi A (2011) Geography, space and the re-emergence of topological thinking. Dialogues in Human Geography 1(3): 299–303.
Riofrancos T (2019) Plan, Mood, Battlefield – Reflections on the Green New Deal. Viewpoint Magazine.
https://www.viewpointmag.com/2019/05/16/plan-mood-battlefield-reflections-on-the-green-new-deal/
Rose G (1995) Distance, Surface, Elsewhere: A Feminist Critique of the Space of Phallocentric Self/Knowledge. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13(6): 761–781.
Sawyer WW (2017) [1943]. Mathematician’s Delight. Mineola: Dover.
Secor A (2013) 2012 Urban Geography Plenary Lecture Topological City. Urban Geography 34(4): 430–444.
Shaw WS, Herman RDK & Dobbs GR (2006) Encountering Indigeneity: Re-Imagining and Decolonizing Geography. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88(3): 267–276.
Siegmund-Schultze R (2009) Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany: Individual Fates and Global Impact. Princeton University Press.
Springer S (2014) Human geography without hierarchy. Progress in Human Geography 38(3): 402–419.
Staeheli LA & Lawson VA (1995) Feminism, Praxis, and Human Geography. Geographical Analysis 27(4): 321–338
Tomba M (2019) Insurgent Universality: An Alternative Legacy of Modernity. Oxford University Press.
Vandermeer J (2014) Area X: The Southern Reach Trilogy: Annihilation; Authority; Acceptance. London: Fourth Estate.
Voss RF (1988). Fractals in nature: From characterization to simulation. In: Peitgen H-O & Saupe D (eds) The Science of Fractal Images. New York: Springer, 21–70.
Woodward K, Jones III JP & Marston SA (2012) The politics of autonomous space. Progress in Human Geography 36(2): 204–224.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteur-e-s publiant dans ACME le font aux conditions de la licence canadienne Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works". En conséquence, les auteur-e-s gardent les droits sur leur texte, ainsi que celui d'être identifié-e-s comme auteur-e-s sans limitation de date. Leur texte peut être partagé librement (soit reproduit, distribué, transmis et publié) dans les conditions suivantes :
- Attribution. La publication originale de ladite oeuvre dans ACME doit être mentionnée et, pour tout usage ou distribution, les termes de sa licence doivent être précisés.
- Non commercial. L'oeuvre ne peut être utilisée à des fins commerciales.
- Pas de travaux dérivés. À l'exception d'usages légitimes dans des buts universitaires ou critiques, l'oeuvre ne peut être altérée ou transformée. À l'exception de la première condition d'attribution à ACME de la publication originale, toutes ces conditions peuvent être levées avec la permission explicite du détenteur du copyright.
(Note: du volume 1(1) au volume 7(2), les auteur-e-s ont donné à ACME un copyright sur leur article limité à la publication dans la revue. Les auteur-e-s gardent le copyright sur leur manuscrit pour toute autre forme de publication, mais doivent mentionner la publication originale dans ACME si le texte est republié ailleurs).
Pour une publication dans ACME, les auteur-e-s déclarent que et se portent garant-e-s que
- leur article est une oeuvre originale, n'a pas été publié avant et n'est pas soumis ailleurs pour publication papier ou électronique sous sa forme finale ;
- Illes ont obtenu l'autorisation de reproduction (papier et électronique) de la part du possesseur des droits de copyright pour tout le matériau qui ne leur appartient pas, et que le possesseur est cité comme source ;
- Leur article ne contient aucun élément violant un copyright existant, le droit d'un tiers, ou quoi que ce soit de nature obscène, indécente, calomniatrice ou en quelque façon illégale ; et, qu'en l'état de leurs connaissance, leur article n'empiète sur les droit de personne.
- Ils ont la charge d'indemniser les rédacteurs et éditeurs d'ACME pour toutes poursuites afférentes à un non respect desdites garanties, indemnisations comprenant l'aide justiciaire et les autres dépenses encourues.
- Dans le cas d'un article avec des multiples auteur-e-s, illes ont obtenu l'accord de tou-te-s les auteur-e-s pour ce contrat d'édition, qui les lie ; et que tou-te-s les auteur-e-s ont lu et approuvé le contrat ci-dessus.