Documenting USDA Discrimination: Community-Partnered Research on Farm Policy for Land Justice

Auteurs-es

  • Amber Ashley Orozco American University
  • Alexandria Ward American University
  • Garrett Graddy-Lovelace American University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v17i4.1514

Mots-clés :

agricultural policy, social equity, food systems, participatory action research, community based research

Résumé

Agriculture in the U.S.--in practice, policy, and scholarship--must reckon with ongoing legacies of structural racism, classism, and patriarchy. Organizations, such as Rural Coalition (RC) and National Family Farm Coalition (NFFC), are at the frontlines, calling for more accountable, equitable agri-food policies. Universities and scholars play a vital role in the engagement of community-based to support these organizations’ efforts. As a case study, this paper draws upon a master’s degree practicum and multi-year collaboration between [university omitted] faculty, students, RC, and NFFC. Students of this practicum engaged in community-based research to support these organization’s understanding of current racial discrimination faced by Black rural farmers, fifteen years after the Pigford civil rights lawsuit cases filed against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Our research explores struggles for racial and land justice in the South. In addition, our paper seeks to provide reflections on the successes, challenges, and impact of community-partnered research for community organizations and students.

Références

Banks, Sarah, and Andrea Armstrong. 2014. Using co-inquiry to study co-inquiry: community-university perspectives on research. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 7(1), 37–47.

Carpenter, Stephen. 2012. The USDA discrimination cases: Pigford, in re Black Farmers, Keepseagle, Garcia, and Love. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 17, 1-34.

Civil Rights at the United States Department of Agriculture: A Report by the Civil Rights Action
Team. February 1997. Washington D.C.

Cowan, Tadlock and Joey Feder. 2010. The Pigford cases: USDA settlement of discrimination suits by black farmers. Congressional Research Service.

Derickson, Kate Driscoll, and Paul Routledge. 2015. Resourcing scholar-activism: collaboration,
transformation, and the production of knowledge. The Professional Geographer 67(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/00330124.2014.883958.

Desmarais, A. 2012. La Via Campesina. Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia.

Escobar, Arturo. 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.

Farmers, Fairness, and the Farm Bill. 2018. Farm Bill 2018: Policy, Politics, and Potential. http://www.farmbillfairness.org/

Federation of Southern Cooperatives Land Assistance Fund. 2018. History/Mission. http://www.federationsoutherncoop.com/files%20home%20page/fschistory/mission.htm

Gilbert, Jess, Gwen Sharp, and M. Sindy Felin. 2002. The loss and persistence of black-owned farms and farmland: a review of the research literature and its implications. Southern Rural Sociology 18(2), 1-30.

Graddy, T. Garrett. 2013. Regarding biocultural heritage: in situ political ecology of agricultural
biodiversity in the Peruvian Andes. Agriculture & Human Values 30(4), 587-604.

Graddy-Lovelace, Garrett. 2016. The coloniality of US agricultural policy: articulating agrarian
(in)justice. Journal of Peasant Studies 43(3), 1-22.

Harney, Liam, Jenny McCurry, James Scott, and Jane Willis. 2016. Developing ‘process
pragmatism’ to underpin engaged research in human geography. Progress in Human Geography 40(3), 316-333.
Janes, Julia E. 2016. Democratic encounters? Epistemic privilege, power, and community-based participatory action research. Action Research 14(1), 72–87.

Kilgannon, Corey. 2018. When the Death of a Family Farm Leads to Suicide. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/nyregion/farmer-suicides-mark-tough-times-for-new-york-dairy-industry.html

Martinez-Alier Joan, Isabelle Anguelovski, Patrick Bond, Daniela Del Bene, Federico Demaria, Julien-Francois Gerber, Lucie Greyl, Willi Haas, Hali Healy, Victoria Marín-Burgos, Godwin Ojo, Marcelo Firpo Porto, Leida Rijnhout, Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos, Joachim Spangenberg, Leah Temper, Rikard Warlenius and Ivonne Yánez. 2014. Between activism and science: grassroots concepts for sustainability coined by Environmental Justice Organizations. Journal of Political Ecology 21, 19-60.

McCutcheon, Priscilla. Food, Faith and Everyday Struggle for Black Urban Community. Social & Cultural Geography 16 (4), 385-406

McKeon, Nora. 2015. “The Peasant’s Way…Journal of World Systems Research.

Merem, Edmund. 2006. The loss of agricultural land among black farmers. Western Journal of Black Studies 30(2), 89-102.

Mountz, Alice, Eli B. Moore, Lori Brown. 2008. Participatory Action Research as Pedagogy: Boundaries in Syracuse. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 7 (2), 214- 238.

Openjuru, George Ladaah, Namrata Jaitli, Rajesh Tandon, and Budd Hall. 2015. Despite knowledge democracy and community-based participatory action research: voices from the global South and excluded north still missing. Action Research 13(3), 219–29.

Reynolds, Kristin and Nevin Cohen. 2016. Beyond the Kale: Urban Agriculture and Social
Justice Activism in New York City. University of Georgia Press: Athens.

The Autonomous Geographies Collective. 2010. Beyond Scholar Activism: Making Strategic Interventions Inside and Outside the Neoliberal University. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 9 (2), 245-275.

United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2012 Census of Agriculture. Highlights- Black Farmers.
https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/Highlights/Black_Farmers/Highlights_Black_Farmers.pdf

United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2012 Census of Agriculture. Race/Ethnicity/Gender Profile. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/Race,_Ethnicity_and_Gender_Profiles/cpd99000.pdf

United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 1997 Census of Agriculture. Table 17, Selected Characteristics of Farms by Specified Racial Groups, Sex of Operators, and Persons of Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Origin: 1997 and 1992. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/AgCensusImages/1997/01/51/1604/Table-17.pdf

White, Monica. 2017. Freedom Farmers: Agricultural Resistance and the Black Freedom Movement, 1880-2010. Food First.

White, Monica. 2017. Preface for Black Agrarianism. In Justine M. Williams & Eric Holt-Giménez. Land Justice Re-Imagining Land, Food, and the Commons in the United States. Oakland: Food First.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2018-10-04

Comment citer

Orozco, A. A., Ward, A., & Graddy-Lovelace, G. (2018). Documenting USDA Discrimination: Community-Partnered Research on Farm Policy for Land Justice. ACME: E-Revue Internationale De géographies Critiques, 17(4), 999–1023. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v17i4.1514

Numéro

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2018): Vol 17, No 4

Rubrique

Themed Section - Food Justice Scholar-Activism and Activist-Scholarship (Guest Eds Reynolds, Block, & Bradley)

Licence

Les auteur-e-s publiant dans ACME le font aux conditions de la licence canadienne Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works". En conséquence, les auteur-e-s gardent les droits sur leur texte, ainsi que celui d'être identifié-e-s comme auteur-e-s sans limitation de date. Leur texte peut être partagé librement (soit reproduit, distribué, transmis et publié) dans les conditions suivantes :

  • Attribution. La publication originale de ladite oeuvre dans ACME doit être mentionnée et, pour tout usage ou distribution, les termes de sa licence doivent être précisés.
  • Non commercial. L'oeuvre ne peut être utilisée à des fins commerciales.
  • Pas de travaux dérivés. À l'exception d'usages légitimes dans des buts universitaires ou critiques, l'oeuvre ne peut être altérée ou transformée. À l'exception de la première condition d'attribution à ACME de la publication originale, toutes ces conditions peuvent être levées avec la permission explicite du détenteur du copyright.

(Note: du volume 1(1) au volume 7(2), les auteur-e-s ont donné à ACME un copyright sur leur article limité à la publication dans la revue. Les auteur-e-s gardent le copyright sur leur manuscrit pour toute autre forme de publication, mais doivent mentionner la publication originale dans ACME si le texte est republié ailleurs).

Pour une publication dans ACME, les auteur-e-s déclarent que et se portent garant-e-s que

  1. leur article est une oeuvre originale, n'a pas été publié avant et n'est pas soumis ailleurs pour publication papier ou électronique sous sa forme finale ;
  2. Illes ont obtenu l'autorisation de reproduction (papier et électronique) de la part du possesseur des droits de copyright pour tout le matériau qui ne leur appartient pas, et que le possesseur est cité comme source ;
  3. Leur article ne contient aucun élément violant un copyright existant, le droit d'un tiers, ou quoi que ce soit de nature obscène, indécente, calomniatrice ou en quelque façon illégale ; et, qu'en l'état de leurs connaissance, leur article n'empiète sur les droit de personne.
  4. Ils ont la charge d'indemniser les rédacteurs et éditeurs d'ACME pour toutes poursuites afférentes à un non respect desdites garanties, indemnisations comprenant l'aide justiciaire et les autres dépenses encourues.
  5. Dans le cas d'un article avec des multiples auteur-e-s, illes ont obtenu l'accord de tou-te-s les auteur-e-s pour ce contrat d'édition, qui les lie ; et que tou-te-s les auteur-e-s ont lu et approuvé le contrat ci-dessus.