Zones of Accumulation Make Spaces of Dispossession

A New Spatial Vocabulary for Human Geography

  • Amy Trauger University of Georgia
  • Jennifer Fluri University of Colorado Boulder
Keywords: Spatial vocabulary, heuristics, accumulation, dispossession

Abstract

Human geographers, scholars in other disciplines and the wider public use outdated spatial vocabulary to reference inequality and divergent geographic histories. Most spatial heuristics in wide use (1st world, North/South, etc.) essentialize progress, homogenize entire nations, obscure inequality at multiple scales and deny the processes of creating difference via imperialism, colonialism and capitalism. In this paper we elaborate on a new spatial vocabulary using geographic theory to identify zones of accumulation and spaces of dispossession. We then address what theories inform this naming convention, what it means and critically reflect on some of its weaknesses, such as its binary nature and relative lack of geographic specificity. We conclude by encouraging wider adoption of these spatial heuristics because they take their logic from geographical theory, actual existing inequality on multiple scales and present-day processes of capitalism.

References

Ahlers R and Zwarteveen M (2009) The water question in feminism: water control and gender inequities in a neo-liberal era. Gender, Place & Culture 16(4): 409–426.

Altwaiji, M. (2014) Neo-Orientalism and the Neo-Imperialism Thesis: Post-9/11 US and Arab World Relationship. Arab Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 313-323.

Amin, S. (1974). Accumulation on a world scale. Monthly Review Press.

Brandt, W. (1980). A program for survival. London: Pan.

Cahill C, Alvarez Gutierrez L and Quijada Cerecer DA (2016) A dialectic of dreams and dispossession. cultural geographies 23(1): 121–137.

Collard R-C and Dempsey J (2018) Accumulation by difference-making: an anthropocene story, starring witches. Gender, Place & Culture 25(9): 1349–1364.

Coulthard, G. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis: Minnesota.

Cravey A, Palis J and Valdivia G (2015) Imagining the future from the margins: cyborg labor in Alex Rivera’s ‘Sleep Dealer’. GeoJournal 80(6). Springer: 867–880.

Desai V (2020) Urban widows: living and negotiating gendered dispossession in speculative slum housing markets in Mumbai. Gender, Place & Culture 0(0). Routledge: 1–21.

Esteve, G., & Prakash, M. S. (1998). Grassroots post-modernism. London: Zed Books.

Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America (Vol. 93). NYU Press.

Hallenbeck, J., Krebs, M., Hunt, S., Goonewardena, K., Kipfer, S. A., Pasternak, S., & Coulthard, G. S. (2016). Red skin, White masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. The AAG Review of Books, 4(2), 111-120.

Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jaffee, D., & Case, R. A. (2018). Draining us dry: scarcity discourses in contention over bottled water extraction. Local Environment, 23(4), 485-501.

Katz C (2018) The Angel of Geography: Superman, Tiger Mother, aspiration management, and the child as waste*. Progress in Human Geography 42(5): 723–740.

Latorre, S., Farrell, K. N., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2015). The commodification of nature and socio-environmental resistance in Ecuador: An inventory of accumulation by dispossession cases, 1980–2013. Ecological Economics, 116, 58-69.

Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.

McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004). Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum, 35(3), 275-283.

Mohanty, C. T. (2004). Towards an anti-imperialist politics: Reflections of a desi feminist. South Asian Popular Culture, 2(1), 69-73.

Mollett S (2017) Irreconcilable differences? A postcolonial intersectional reading of gender, development and HumanRights in Latin America. Gender, Place & Culture 24(1): 1–17.

Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Duke University Press.

Osborne, T. (2017). Public Political Ecology: a community of praxis for earth stewardship. Journal of Political Ecology, 24(1), 843-860.

Patel, R. (2012). Stuffed and starved: The hidden battle for the world food system. Melville House Pub.

Petras, J. (1981). Dependency and world system theory: a critique and new directions. Latin American Perspectives, 8(3-4), 148-155.

Povinelli, E. (2011). Economies of abandonment. Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism.

Quah, D. (2011). The global economy’s shifting centre of gravity. Global Policy, 2(1), 3-9.

Rajagopal, B. (2000). Locating the Third World in Cultural Geography. Third World Legal Studies, 15(1), 2.

Rigg, J. (2007). An everyday geography of the global south. London: Routledge.

Said, E. W. (1978, 1995). Orientalism: western conceptions of the Orient. 1978. Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin, 115.

Sheppard, E., Porter, P. W., Faust, D. R., & Nagar, R. (2009). A world of difference: Encountering and contesting development. Guilford Press.

Trauger, A. (2014). Is bigger better? The small farm imaginary and fair trade banana production in the Dominican Republic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(5), 1082-1100.

Trauger, A., & Fluri, J. L. (2019). Engendering Development: Capitalism and Inequality in the Global Economy. Routledge.

Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world-economy (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.

Wright, M. (2013). Disposable women and other myths of global capitalism. London: Routledge.

Wright MW (2014) The Gender, Place and Culture Jan Monk Distinguished Annual Lecture: Gentrification, assassination and forgetting in Mexico: a feminist Marxist tale. Gender, Place & Culture 21(1). Routledge: 1–16.
Published
2020-12-14
How to Cite
Trauger, A., & Fluri, J. (2020). Zones of Accumulation Make Spaces of Dispossession. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 20(1), 1-16. Retrieved from https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1989
Section
Interventions