Action research in critical scholarship: Negotiating multiple imperatives
Critical scholars sometimes accuse action researchers of not being radical enough in their approach, while action researchers often see the work of critical scholars as elitist and not grounded in people’s everyday experiences. This article draws on an action research project with residents in urban informal settlements in Malawi and their partner organizations in the period 2013-2017 to discuss how research can negotiate and achieve its multiple imperatives of being critical and rooted, explanatory and actionable. It shows how the action research approach with its collaborative elements helped the research project avoid what Louis McNay (2014:4) calls “social weightlessness” in political theorizing – “an abstract way of thinking that is so far removed from the actual practices and dynamics of everyday life that, ultimately, its own analytical relevance and normative validity are thrown into question”. The article reflects on the possibilities and limitations of the integrated approach developed in the project and suggests that action research in critical scholarship is a way to avoid ‘social weightlessness’ in theorizing while at the same time responding to some of the critique made against action research for not engaging with structural inequality and systemic change at scale.
Allen, John. 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Malden: Blackwell.
Beauregard, Robert A. 2012. What theorists do. Urban Geography 33, 474–487.
Bènit-Gbaffou, Claire and Sophie Oldfield. 2014. Claiming ‘rights’ in the African city: popular mobilization and the politics of informality. In Susan Parnell and Sophie Oldfield (eds.) The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 281-296.
Blomley, Nicholas. 2006. Uncritical critical geography? Progress in Human Geography. 30 (1), 87-94.
Bohman, James. 2016. Critical theory. In, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/critical-theory/ (accessed 3 October 2016).
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
Brenner, Neil. 2009. What is critical urban theory? City 13(2–3), 198–207.
Brickell, Katherine and Garrett, Bradley. 2015. ACME 14 (3), 928-953.
Brun, Cathrine and Ragnhild Lund. 2010. Real-time research: Decolonizing research practices – or just another spectacle of researcher–practitioner collaboration? Development in Practice 20(7), 812–826.
Burns, Danny. 2014. Systemic action research: Changing system dynamics to support sustainable change. Action Research 12(1), 3–18.
Cammack, Diana. 2012. Malawi in crisis, 2011-2012. Review of African Political Economy 39 (132), 375-388.
Cammack, Diana. 2007. The logic of African neopatrimonialism: What role for donors? Development Policy Review 25(5), 599–614.
Castells, Manuel. 1972. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. London: Edward Arnold.
Centre for Community Organization and Development (CCODE). 2012. Mtandire Enumeration Report, Lilongwe: CCODE.
Centre for Community Organization and Development (CCODE). 2011. Chinsapo Enumeration Report, Lilongwe: CCODE.
Chambers, Robert. 1983. Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Chatterton, Paul, Duncan Fuller and Paul Routledge. 2007. Relating theory to activism: Theoretical and methodological reflections. In, Sara Kindon, Rachel Pain & Mike Kesby (eds), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge, pp. 216–223.
Choudry, Aziz. 2014. (Almost) Everything you always wanted to know about activist research but were afraid to ask: What activist researchers say about theory and methodology. Contention: The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest 1(2), 75–88.
Cooke, Bill and Uma Kothari (eds). 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed.
Cornwall, Andrea. 2004. Spaces for transformation? Reflections on issues of power and difference in participation in development. In, Samuel Hickey & Giles Mohan (eds), Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed, pp. 75–91.
Davidson, Mark and Kurt Iveson. 2014. Occupations, mediations, subjectifications: fabricating politics. Space and Polity 18 (2), 137-152.
Dikeç, Mustafa. 2005. Space, politics and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (2), 171-188.
Dikeç, Mustafa, 2007. Badlands of the Republic: Space, Politics and Urban Policy. London: Blackwells.
Dikeç, Mustafa. 2012. Space as a mode of political thinking. Geoforum 43 (4), 669-676.
Dick, Bob, Ernie Stringer and Chris Huxham. 2009. Introduction: Theory in action research. Action Research 7(1), 5–12.
Diprose, Gradon. 2015. Negotiating contradiction: work, redundancy and participatory art. AREA 47(3), 246-253.
Dolan, Chris, Thea Shakrokh, Jerker Edström, and Darius King Kabafunzaki. 2017. Engaged Excellence or Excellent Engagement? Collaborating Critically to Amplify the Voices of Male Survivors of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence. IDS Bulletin 47(6), 19-37.
Englund, H., 2006. Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Fals Borda, Orlando. 2013. Action Research in the Convergence of Disciplines. International Journal of Action Research 9.2: 155–67
Franks, Aaron. 2015. Kinder cuts and passionate modesties: the complex ecology of the invitation in participatory research. AREA 47 (3), 237-245.
Fraser, Nancy. 1985. What`s Critical about Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender. New German Critique. 35, 97-131.
Freire, Paulo 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Friedman, Victor J. and Tim Rogers. 2009. There is nothing so theoretical as good action research. Action Research 7(1), 31–47.
Garrett, Bradley, L. and Katherine Brickell. 2015. Participatory politics of partnership: video workshops on domestic violence in Cambodia. AREA 47, 230–236.
Greenwood, Davydd. 2002. Action research: Unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges. Concepts and Transformation. 7(2), 117–139.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3), 575–599.
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Harvey, David. 1973. Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.
Harvey, David. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to Urban Revolution. New York: Verso.
Hickey, Samuel and Giles Mohan (eds.). 2004. Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed.
Holston, James. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
hooks, bell. 1990. Postmodern blackness. Postmodern Culture 1(1). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Isin, Engin F. 2008. Theorizing acts of citizenship. In, Engin F. Isin & Greg M. Nielsen (eds), Acts of Citizenship. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–43.
Johansson, Anders W. and Erik Lindhult. 2008. Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action Research 6(1), 95–115.
Jordan, Steven and Dip Kapoor. 2016. Re-politicizing participatory action research: Unmasking neoliberalism and the illusions of participation. Educational Action Research 24(1), 134-149.
Kallio, Kirsi Pauliina. 2012. Political presence and the politics of noise. Space and Polity 16 (3), 287-302.
Kapoor, Ilan. 2002. The devil’s in the theory: A critical assessment of Robert Chambers’ work on participatory development. Third World Quarterly 23(1), 101–117.
Kemmis, Stephen 2006. Exploring the relevance of Critical Theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas. In, Peter Reason & Hilary Bradbury (eds), Handbook of Action Research: Concise Paperback Edition. London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, pp. 94–106.
Kesby, Mike 2005. Retheorizing empowerment-through-participation as a performance in space: Beyond tyranny to transformation. Signs 30(4), 2037–2065.
Kesby Mike, Sara Kindon and Rachel Pain. 2005. ‘Participatory’ approaches
and diagramming techniques in Flowerdew Robin and David Martin (eds.) Methods in human geography. Harlow: Pearson 144–66
Kindon, Sara, Rachel Pain and Mike Kesby. 2007. Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge.
Kobayashi, Audrey. 1994. Coloring the field: Gender, ‘race,’ and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 46(1), 73–80.
Kobayashi, Audrey and Linda Peake. 2000. Racism out of place: Thoughts on whiteness and an antiracist geography in the new millenium. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90, 392–403.
Lefebvre, Henri. 1974. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Levin, Morten. 2012. The academic integrity of action research. Action Research 10(2), 133–149.
Manda, M.A.Z., 2007. Grassroots-led urban development: potentials, achievements,
limitations – experiences in Malawi. Paper presented at the 8th N-AERIUS Conference, London.
Manda, Mtafu .A.Z. 2013. Situation of Urbanization in Malawi Report, prepared for the Ministry of Lands and Housing, Lilongwe.
Marchart, Oliver. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man. Boston, MA: Beacon.
McFarlane, Colin. 2011. Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. Wiley Online Library.
McNay, Louise. 2014. The Misguided Search for the Political. Social Weightlessness in Radical Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Miraftab, Faranak. 2004. Invited and invented spaces of participation: Neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notions of politics. Wagadu 1(Spring), 1–7.
Miraftab, Faranak. 2005. Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship: The story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25(2), 200–217.
Mitlin, Diana and Sheela Patel. 2014. The urban poor and strategies for a pro-poor politics – Reflections on Shack/slum dwellers International, in Parnell, S. and Oldfield, S. (eds.) 2014. The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, Chapter 26: 296-308, London and New York: Routledge
Mohan Giles. 2006. Beyond participation: strategies for deeper empowerment in Cooke Bill and Uma Kothari (eds.) Participation: the new tyranny? London: Zed Books, 134–67.
Mohan, Giles and Kristian Stokke. 2000. Participatory development and empowerment: The dangers of localism. Third World Quarterly 21(2), 247–268.
Moini, Giulio, 2011. How participation has become a hegemonic discursive resource: towards an interpretivist research agenda. Critical Policy Studies 5 (2), 149-168.
Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research 66(3), 745–758.
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
Mwathunga, Evance. 2014. Contesting Spaces in Urban Malawi: A Lefebvrian Analysis. Phd dissertation, Stellenbosch University. Available at: http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/86660 (accessed 01 January 2017).
Nagar, Richa. 2014. Muddying the Waters – Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism. Illnois: University of Illnois Press.
Nagar, Richa. 2002. Footloose researchers, ‘travelling’ theories, and the politics of transnational feminist praxis. Gender, Place and Culture 9, 179–186.
National Statistical Office (NSO) 2010. Spatial Distribution and Urbanization 2010. Lilongwe: Government of Malawi.
Nowotny, Helga. 2003. Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Sci Public Policy. 30(3), 151-156.
Oldfield, Sophie. 2015. Between activism and the academy. The urban as political terrain. Urban Studies 52(11), 2072-2086.
Oxford Dictionary of Geography. 2015. A Dictionary of Geography. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pain, Rachel, Sara Kindon and Mike Kesby. 2007. Participatory action research: making a difference to theory, practice and action in Kindon Sara, Rachel Pain and Mike Kesby (eds.) Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. London: Routledge, 26–32.
Purcell, Mark. 2014. Rancière and revolution. Space and Polity 18(2), 168–181.
Purcell, Mark. 2013. The Down-Deep Delight of Democracy. Wiley-Blackwell, UK.
Rancière, Jacques. 1992. Politics, identification, and subjectivization. October 61(Summer), 58–64.
Rancière, Jacques. 2001. Ten theses on politics. Theory and Event 5(2).
Rancière, Jacques. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso.
Rancière, Jacques. 2011. The thinking of dissensus: Politics and aesthetics. In, Paul Bowman & Richard Stamp (eds), Reading Rancière. London: Continuum, pp. 1–17.
Reason, Peter and Hilary Bradbury (eds). 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
Refstie, Hilde. 2013. Doing it ourselves – Community mobilization and strategic planning in Senti settlement. NTNU, CCODE, and TRI, Lilongwe. https://actmalawi.com/2017/12/20/case-study-1-senti/ accessed 02.05.2016
Refstie, Hilde. 2014a. Building Representation and Partnerships – Chikanda Zomba, NTNU, CCODE, and TRI, Lilongwe. https://actmalawi.com/2017/12/15/case-study-2-zomba-chikanda/ accessed 04.05.2016
Refstie, Hilde. 2014b. From Plans to Action: Mobilizing Funds and Credits for Slum Upgrading in Nancholi Blantyre, NTNU, CCODE, and TRI, Lilongwe. https://actmalawi.com/2017/12/14/case-study-3-nancholi-chimiire/ accessed 04.04.2016
Refstie, Hilde. 2014c. Negotiating Services through Community Committees – Ndirande Makata Blantyre, NTNU, CCODE, and TRI, Lilongwe. https://actmalawi.com/2017/12/13/case-study-4-ndirande-makata/ accessed 04.05.2016
Refstie, Hilde. 2014d. Left Hanging? Participatory Slum Upgrading and Studio Planning in Salisburyline, NTNU, CCODE, and TRI, Lilongwe. https://actmalawi.com/2017/12/12/case-study-5-salisburyline-mzuzu/ accessed 04.05.2016
Refstie, Hilde. 2015. Is this Participatory Budgeting? The Blantyre Process, NTNU, CCODE, and TRI, Lilongwe. https://actmalawi.com/2017/12/11/case-study-6-participatory-budgeting-blantyre/ accessed 09.07.2017
Refstie, Hilde and Cathrine Brun. 2011. Towards transformative participation: Collaborative research with ‘urban IDPs’ in Uganda. Journal of Refugee Studies 25(2), 239–256.
Refstie, Hilde and Cathrine Brun. 2016. Voicing noise: Political agency and the trialectics of participation in urban Malawi. Geoforum 74, 136–146.
Robins, Steven, Andrea Cornwall and Bettina von Lieres 2008. Rethinking 'citizenship' in the postcolony. Third World Quarterly 29 (6) pp. 1069-1086.
Shapiro, Ian. 2007. The Flight From Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shaw, Jacqueline. 2012.Interrogating the gap between the ideals and practice reality of participatory video in Milne, E-J, Mitchell ,Claudia, and Lange, Naydene de (eds.) Handbook of participatory video. 225-242, Plymouth: Altamira Press.
Silungwe, Chikosa M. 2009. Customary land tenure reform and development: A critique of customary land tenure reform under Malawi’s national land policy. Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal 2009(1). Available at: https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2009_1/silungwe/ (accessed 20 December 2016).
Sitas, Ari. 2004. Voices that Reason: Theoretical Parables. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers and Pretoria: UNISA Press.
Spivak, Gayatri C. 1988: Can the subaltern speak? Marxism and the interpretation of culture. In, Cary Nelson & Lawrence Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, pp. 271–313.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 2011. Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political spaces. Political Geography 30(7), 370–380.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 2014. Where is the political? Insurgent mobilisations and the incipient ‘return of the political’. Space and Polity 18(2), 122–136.
UN Habitat 2012. Malawi National Urban Profile. Nairobi: UN-Habitat
Winterbauer, Nancy L., Bekemeyer, Betty, VanRaemdonck, Lisa, and Anna G. Hoover 2016. Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Principles to Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks. SAGE Open, October-December 1-13.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors agree to publish their articles in ACME under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence. To read and review agreement, click here.