“Environmental Sustainability? We Don’t Have That Here”: Freetown Christiania as an Unintentional Eco-village
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v15i1.1122Abstract
How did an unintentional squat come to be termed an eco-village, and why would this car-free town reject a bicycle path? This article brings pressing urban and environmental issues together through a case study of “Freetown Christiania”, a squatter community located in the downtown of Copenhagen, Denmark’s capital city. With a framework based on the concepts of sustainable lifestyles and Leitner et al’s urban neoliberal contestations, I identify Christiania’s alternative socio-spatial imaginaries and practices. Ethnographic field work consisting of interviews and participant observation while living at the community’s researcher house allow for an in-depth exploration of Christiania’s history and experiences, and their implications for conventional conceptions of and pathways to sustainability. I show how Christiania’s values and practices differ from the “green” priorities of Copenhagen’s carbon neutral goal, with resistance to Christianshavnruten, a proposed cycle path that would cut through Christiania. My findings show resistance to the dominant discourse of sustainability, for example through a temporal focus on the present as opposed to the conventional considerations for future generations. Christiania’s dedication to self-expression, consensus decision making, and collective ownership, allow for considerations on how urban citizens reclaim their everyday spaces.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors agree to publish their articles in ACME under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-