The Flâneur, The Hot-Rodder, and the Slow Food Activist: Archetypes of Capitalist Coasting

Authors

  • Jeffrey D Blankenship Hobart and William Smith Colleges
  • Jessica Hayes-Conroy Hobart and William Smith Colleges

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v16i2.1383

Keywords:

capitalism, slow death, bodies, landscape, flâneur, hot-rodder, slow food

Abstract

The flâneur was a modern literary figure that characterized the relationship of capitalism to urban alienation in 19th-century Paris. Our contention in this paper is that the flâneur can also be seen as an exemplar of a broader archetypical figure that exists across time, in multiple landscapes of capitalism. Following the work of Lauren Berlant on “slow death,” we identify this broader archetype as an adept “capitalist coaster”—one whose embodied “art” is the successful making and movement of the self within the maelstrom of capitalist modernity. We describe three examples of this archetype—the flâneur, the hot-rodder, and the slow food activist—arguing that all three personify a particular sort of privileged mobility that enables surviving within contemporary life. Tracing this archetype through time and space, we suggest that attention to the figure of the capitalist coaster is useful for interrogating how privilege produces specific forms of embodied coping within the varied landscapes of capitalism. We argue that attention to this coping is important for understanding the relationship between capitalist resistance and reproduction, as well as the structural conditions that impact the uneven embodied consequences of coping. 

Author Biographies

Jeffrey D Blankenship, Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Assistant Professor of Architectural Studies

Jessica Hayes-Conroy, Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Assistant Professor of Women's Studies

Downloads

Published

2017-07-28

How to Cite

Blankenship, J. D., & Hayes-Conroy, J. (2017). The Flâneur, The Hot-Rodder, and the Slow Food Activist: Archetypes of Capitalist Coasting. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v16i2.1383

Issue

Section

Research